All posts by admin

Municipal District Funding Scheme 2018

Cork County Council’s Municipal District Funding Scheme 2018 is offering three different types of grant:

1. Capital Fund – for community groups, sporting and local organisations who would like to undertake infrastructural projects costing over €20,000 that would improve the range or quality of community-based facilities within their area

2. Community Contract – for Tidy Towns groups who work with Cork County Council on local works and projects, agreed with the local Area Engineer, that enhance the area in which the group is active.

3. Amenity Fund Scheme – for community groups, sporting and local organisations in County Cork who wish to undertake projects or purchase equipment to a value of less than €20,000 that directly benefits communities and meets particular needs.

The following link explains the guidelines for each of the grants:  Community Fund Guidelines

If at all possible, applications for the grant schemes are to be made on-line through https://www.yourcouncil.ie/ and applicants will need to register with YourCouncil.ie to apply.

The closing date for applications is 4pm on Friday 16th February 2018.

My letter to the Minister re. the boundary extension at Hop Island, December 2017

Before we started a briefing of Cork County Council to discuss the proposed new City boundary on Monday, 4th Dec, we were distributed with a map:

 

 

 

 

 

That same evening, Cork City Council also sat in their Chamber in City Hall.  They too had a map distributed to them.  You can see the scale of the difference at Hop Island/Passage West and Upper Monkstown:

 

 

 

 

I emailed our Chief Executive asking how on earth it was possible that two different maps were being discussed by the two different authorities on the same evening on foot of a joint negotiation.  He responded, advising that the map distributed to the City Council had not been authorised but that the map we had distributed to us did not show the results of a final element of the negotiations preceding the Council briefings.  The County wanted the boundary to run to the Chetwynd Viaduct at the N71 rather than further out at the brow of the hill.  The City didn’t agree.  But the City’s Lord Mayor wanted Hop Island.  At the last minute, the City negotiating team ceded the ground at Chetwynd, saying the boundary could be at the Viaduct if the County would give Hop Island.  The County’s Chief Executive said fine: the boundary could be set at the MacKinnon suggested line at Hop Island, i.e. almost down to the development boundary of Passage West.

The implication locally for us is that in developing our town, we will be trying to plan and maintain one of our greatest marketing tools – the Greenway – through a different local authority.  I know from working in Douglas how difficult this can be.  So after having spent a day on the phone to some of my fellow councillors, I wrote the following letter, asking for the Minister to please consider the future of Passage West, cc’ing it to those listed and including a personal covering letter:
Letter to Minister, 07-12-2017_3

I got no acknowledgement from anyone, either the Minister or any of those cc’ed.  On Monday 11th Dec, the final map to be recommended to the Minister was circulated to all County councillors at our statutory meeting:

 

 

 

 

 

The Chief Executive, the Deputy Chief and the Mayor were all away on business.  Many of us spoke at that meeting, including myself.  Our efforts were always going to be wasted emotion.  The new boundary as indicated in final map was recommended to the Minister and was approved by cabinet yesterday morning.

Motion requesting That Ireland would ratify the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments

“That Ireland would ratify the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments 2004.”

 

Motion to full Council, 23-10-2017

 

When a ship’s cargo is unloaded, ballast water is pumped in to maintain safe operating conditions throughout a voyage.  When the ship is later reloaded, often on the other side of the world, the water is discharged.  So ballast water is essential for safe and efficient modern shipping operations.

 

But ballast water may pose serious ecological, economic and health problems.  As the ballast tanks are filled and drained in different sequences, the water in one tank may comprise water and sediments from several ports.  And that water will include organisms, suspended solids, chemicals, including industrial and human wastes.  In 14 recent European ballast studies, 990 different species were recorded from ballast tanks, ranging from bacteria to 15 cm long fishes.  Discharge of ballast tanks into port waters far from where it was taken on board gives a very real and direct opportunity for species transfer between countries.  Specialists in the UN estimate that more than 7,000 species can be carried across the globe in ships’ ballast tanks.  Some of these may be pathogenic and some may be invasive in an environment that is not their own. 

 

The National Biodiversity Data Centre estimates that invasive and non-native species cost Ireland and Northern Ireland some €261 million every year due to biodiversity loss and impact on economic activity and human health.  Japanese knotweed has shown us that even to control an invasive species takes massive time and financial resources. The NBDC estimates that about 13% of the 377 recorded non-native species here have a high-risk impact.  And the rate of introduction is increasing.

 

Shipping is global.  90% of goods are carried around the world in ships.  it is reckoned to transfer up to 5 billion tonnes of ballast water around ports of the world every year.  So tackling the spread of disease and invasives through ballast water has to be a global issue.  This is what the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments is all about.  Led by the IMO Member States, it was adopted after 14 years of negotiation.  It entered into force last September.  But it works only if it is ratified by everybody.  Over 50 countries have done so.  Ireland, although it drafted legislation in 2006 to allow its implementation here, has not yet ratified the Convention.  The only really effective way of tackling invasives is controlling them at source.  Here we have a real opportunity to protect ourselves and others by doing just that and we haven’t done it yet.  Direct contact with the IMO office in London indicates that they are very anxious that we would do so and cannot understand why we are not.  Last year, Minister Shane Ross has said that the 2006 legislation is being amended to take account of recent changes to the convention and that Ireland would ratify it before it entered into force.  But we haven’t. 

 

Ask that we would write to the Minister asking that we express our desire for Ireland to follow up on its promise of years, not waste any more time and ratify this convention.

Equipment Grant Scheme for voluntary youth clubs/groups

The Equipment Grant Scheme focuses on the provision of small scale equipment grants to local voluntary youth clubs/groups. Grants may cover equipment such as: Storage, IT equipment, electrical equipment, sporting equipment, arts and drama equipment etc.  Please ensure that in any applications for equipment that would have additional health and safety requirements that this is included in the items applied for.  Also please at this point consider appropriate secure storage and if necessary include appropriate secure storage in the items applied for.

The maximum grant available is €5,000. Please note for purchases between €3,000 – €5,000, three quotes are required. One quote is sufficient for items under €2,000.

Any equipment applied for must directly benefit the members of the youth club/group.

The grant scheme application form is at the following link.  If anyone would like a Word copy of the form, just drop me an email.  Closing date is Friday 20th October.

LYCES Application form 2017[1]

Request for a ban on balloon releases: My motion to the Southern Committee of Cork County Council, 18-09-2017

“That in view of the risk balloons waste can pose to wild animals, birds and the marine environment and its contribution to litter generally, Cork County Council would ban balloon releases within its jurisdiction.” 

Balloon releases are beautiful.  They are emotional, symbolic and are generally organised for very worthy charitable causes and special commemorative events.

But the reality is that the few minutes that magnificent visual impact is over, the balloons don’t disappear.  Between 80 – 95% of released balloons rise to an altitude of 5 miles where the pressure and temperature is such that they burst into small fragments.  The remaining 5 – 15% don’t make it that high and can float many miles before descending back to the land or sea, semi-inflated.

Balloons can be made of either mylar or latex.  Mylar is a plastic and simply doesn’t biodegrade.  Latex in the natural state is biodegradable but balloons on land can take 6 months to biodegrade and in salt water, 12 months.  During this time, they are a particularly dangerous litter.

On land, balloon fragments can harm wild and domestic animals and livestock.  In the marine environment, sea turtles, birds and other surface-feeding animals can mistake floating balloons for jellyfish and may attempt to eat them.  Balloons can directly cause a slow and miserable death by blocking the digestive tract, eventually leading to starvation.  This has been witnessed and documented by organisations all over the world including the UK DEFRA  and latex balloons have been found in the digestive systems of many species in Irish waters, including some of which are protected by law.  In sea turtles, balloons have in fact been found to reside without digestion or excretion for up to 4 months.

Balloons can cause death indirectly because more than 95% of phytoplankton, the essential building blocks of marine ecosystems, are killed by latex rubber within 4 days.  Moreover, the word “biodegradable” does not identify that in degrading, latex goes through a sticky phase which increases the choking risk if it is ingested.

Birds legs and necks have become wrapped in the strings attached to balloons.  When flippers and fins of sea turtles, seals and dolphins become similarly entrapped, it can cause infection, amputation and death by drowning.

All that aside, a staggering 8% of the world’s helium supply is used for filling party balloons.  Helium is a non-renewable resource which we desperately need for other products we treasure such as MRI scanners, fibre optics and LCD screens.

The UK Marine Conservation Society has found a frightening average of 3 balloons per km of coast surveyed.  Surveys of beach litter in the UK have found that the number of balloons and balloon fragments has tripled in the past 10 years, doubling between 2015 and 2016 alone.

Balloon releases have been banned in several states in the US including California, Connecticut, Florida, Tennessee and Virginia.  At least 7 other US cities have similar laws in place.  They have been banned in places in Australia.  34 local authorities in England, 10 in Scotland, 14 in Wales and 4 in Northern Ireland have forbidden balloon releases on public ground.

Environmental organisations all over the world have been asking for a ban on balloon releases for many years.

It is tragic that generally because of a lack of awareness, something that is beautiful, poignant and celebratory should cause so much downstream destruction, suffering and death.  There are other equally wonderful ways in which events can be marked, ways which do not cause downstream environmental harm.

I welcome the sensitive and considered response from the executive.”

Deliberations on the proposed Mackinnon boundary review for Cork City and County

I wrote the piece at the link below  in mid-June for the Carrigdhoun newspaper.  At the time, the Mackinnon-led “expert” committee had made their recommendation for a 35km-wide City jurisdiction, stretching from Ballincollig to Carrigtwohill, to include Blarney but to exclude Passage West.  The debate about this issue rumbles on and Mackinnon’s recommendations make no more sense to me now than they did two months ago.

The County Council has since offered areas closest to Cork City to the City Council.  These areas include the Strategic Land Reserve identified by the County for potential residential development.  The extent of the land offered is such that it would increase the City’s area by 85%, allow an immediate population increase of 31.2%, a potential population increase of up to 283,600 and would offer a residential density on a par with that in Dublin City .  Any feedback I have had from constituents on the County’s most recent offer has been positive; they say it makes far more sense to them than the City boundary proposed by Mackinnon.  (Apart from one constituent living in an area close to the City who very much wants no boundary change at all.)

Under Mackinnon’s recommendations, the Cork Harbour area would be split between City and County.  It has recently been suggested that I should be pushing for the entire of Cork Harbour to be included in the expanded City boundary.  I have in fact already written about this (in the article below), but believe that this oneness would best be achieved in the context of a merger of City and County:

19-06-2017 – boundary extension

My submission to the M28 planning application

My submission to the M28 planning appplication is at the link below.  This is a TII/Cork County Council project.  We need vastly improved connectivity out of Ringaskiddy and if there is to be a motorway, that’s fine too.  But at least let it follow a route that will actually keep traffic free-flowing and won’t destroy people’s lives:

Submission to ABP, 18-08-2017